CONGESTION CHARGES: SHORT CHANGE

Why Rock the Vote Stands Firm Against Auckland's Proposed Congestion Charge

Auckland's traffic congestion is undeniably a pressing issue, with reports indicating it could cost the city up to $2.6 billion annually by 2026 due to lost productivity and increased emissions . In response, the government has introduced the Land Transport Management (Time-of-Use Charging) Amendment Bill, aiming to implement congestion pricing during peak hours to alleviate traffic woes.

While the intent to address congestion is commendable, Rock the Vote NZ firmly opposes this proposal. We believe that the congestion charge is an impractical solution that disproportionately affects lower-income Aucklanders and fails to address the root causes of our traffic problems.

Why the Congestion Charge Falls Short

• Disproportionate Impact on Lower-Income Residents: The proposed charge does not account for the financial strain it places on those who cannot afford to live close to their workplaces and lack viable public transport alternatives. For instance, commuters like Tamsyn Parker from Kumeū already endure 90-minute drives to the CBD, with limited options to adjust their schedules or routes .

• Insufficient Public Transport Infrastructure: Implementing a congestion charge without first enhancing public transport options is premature. Many areas in Auckland suffer from infrequent and unreliable bus services, making it challenging for residents to switch from private vehicles to public transport .

• Potential for Revenue Misallocation: While the bill suggests that revenue from the congestion charge will fund transport improvements, there is skepticism about whether these funds will be effectively utilized to benefit those most affected by the charge.

Alternative Solutions Aligned with Our Values

At Rock the Vote NZ, we advocate for equitable and sustainable solutions to Auckland's congestion issues:

• Invest in Public Transport: Prioritize the development of reliable, frequent, and affordable public transport options, including the expansion of bus and rail networks, to provide viable alternatives to private car use.

• Promote Flexible Work Arrangements: Encourage businesses to adopt flexible working hours and remote work policies to reduce peak-hour traffic volumes.

• Enhance Active Transport Infrastructure: Develop safe and accessible walking and cycling paths to encourage non motorized modes of transport.

• Implement Smart Traffic Management: Utilize technology to optimize traffic flow through adaptive traffic signals and real time traffic monitoring systems.

Conclusion

While addressing Auckland's congestion is imperative, implementing a congestion charge without first ensuring equitable and practical alternatives is not the solution. Rock the Vote NZ remains committed to advocating for policies that prioritize accessibility, equity, and sustainability. We urge policymakers to consider more holistic approaches that address the underlying issues contributing to our city's traffic challenges.