CO-GOVERNANCE IS UNWORKABLE

Why Rock the Vote NZ Stands Against The Principle of Co-Governance

Recent proposals to expand co-governance arrangements in New Zealand have sparked significant debate. These arrangements involve shared decision-making authority between the Crown and Māori representatives over public resources and services. While proponents argue that co-governance honours the Treaty of Waitangi and promotes inclusivity, Rock the Vote NZ firmly opposes these proposals, viewing them as unworkable and contrary to democratic principles.

Concerns Over Co-Governance

1. Democratic Integrity: Co-governance structures often grant decision-making power to unelected Māori representatives, which can undermine the principle of equal representation in a democratic society.

2. Public Accountability: Shared governance can blur lines of accountability, making it challenging for citizens to hold decision-makers responsible for their actions.

3. Potential for Division: Institutionalizing separate governance structures based on ethnicity may foster division rather than unity, contradicting the goal of a cohesive national identity.

OUR APPROACH

Rock the Vote NZ advocates for solutions that uphold democratic principles while recognizing the unique status of Māori as tangata whenua:

1. Inclusive Consultation: Ensure that Māori voices are heard through robust consultation processes within existing democratic frameworks, without establishing separate structures.

2. Building Governance: Invest in initiatives that empower Māori through communities education, economic development, and social services, promoting self determination within the broader national context.

3. Transparent Decision Making: Maintain clear and accountable governance structures where all citizens, regardless of ethnicity, have equal opportunities to participate influence decisions.

Conclusion

While acknowledging the importance of honouring the Treaty of Waitangi and addressing historical injustices, Rock the Vote NZ believes that co-governance proposals, as currently framed, are unworkable and risk undermining democratic integrity. We support approaches that promote unity, equal representation, and accountability within a single, inclusive governance system.